Use case · Critical libraries
High-signal correctness bugs in libraries everyone depends on.
Proof finds reproducible correctness and security issues in major libraries, then turns confirmed findings into regression evidence maintainers and downstream users can act on.
Reproducer · Severity rationale · Patch verificationAudit goalConfirmed only
Input
High-impact library, release window, or fragile subsystem.
Output
Confirmed finding, reproducer, severity rationale, regression path, disclosure status.
Value
A single confirmed issue becomes the starting point for continuous coverage of the class.
Buyer pain
A small library bug can become a platform problem.
Maintainers
Need precise reports that respect disclosure and reduce triage burden.
Security teams
Need high-confidence findings, not speculative scanner output.
Infrastructure users
Need to understand whether a dependency bug affects their production path.
Proof points
Every claim should be backed by something rerunnable.
- Minimal reproducer or deterministic test where feasible.
- Severity rationale tied to affected surface and blast radius.
- Patch verification when a fix is available.
- Disclosure-safe writeup after maintainer/customer approval.
- Path from one finding into continuous coverage of the class.
Starting point
Bring one dependency or fragile subsystem.
- Focus on libraries with broad downstream impact.
- Confirm behavior with a minimized reproducer or deterministic test where feasible.
- Map severity to affected surface, exploitability, and blast radius.
- Verify patches and adjacent regression risk after a fix lands.
Do not submit secrets or private source code here. See Trust.