Background diagram: an animated engineering schematic. Commits flow from a station labeled YOUR AGENTS on the left into a vertical gate of 52 checks at center. Most pass through and exit right toward SHIP; roughly one in twelve turns red at the gate, loops down through a REPRODUCER station, and returns to re-enter the flow fixed. Each completed fix settles as a permanent pin in a growing CORPUS lattice below the gate. A thin stream rises to a SIGNATURES station at top right, where humans sign. The headline is lettered directly onto the drawing, with leader lines to its subjects, and a status strip along the bottom edge counts this session's simulated commits, findings, and pins — live counts from the animation, not business claims.

YOUR AGENTSCOMMITS IN COMMITS IN — ENGINEER OR AGENT
THE GATE52 CHECKS · EXIT ≠ 0 SAME BAR — HUMAN OR AGENT
SHIPPROMISES HOLD GREEN MEANS THE PROMISES HOLD
SIGNATURESHUMANS SIGN, BY NAME EVERY APPROVAL CARRIES A HUMAN NAME
REPRODUCERFINDING + FIX PROMPT EVERY FINDING SHIPS READY TO FIX
THE CORPUSPERMANENT PINS CLOSED CLASSES STAY CLOSED
REQPROOF — LIVING BLUEPRINT
DWG NO. PRF-15  ·  REV A
SCALE: ONE COMPONENT
CHECKED BY: NAMED REVIEWER, ALWAYS
REQUEST SCOPING READ THE DRAWING
SYSTEM LIVE COMMITS 0 FINDINGS CAUGHT 0 PINS STANDING 84 THIS DRAWING'S SESSION — SIM COUNTS, NOT BUSINESS CLAIMS

Your agents write. Your humans sign. Proof remembers.

LEGEND
A LIVING ASSURANCE SYSTEM FOR CODEBASES WHERE AGENTS NOW WRITE MOST OF THE CODE.
Every approval carries a human name.
Every finding ships with evidence and a fix prompt.
Every fix becomes a permanent pin in a corpus that never forgets.
STATIC RENDER — MOTION REDUCED

52 checks. Exit ≠ 0 until the promises hold.

NOTE 1 — Every commit — engineer or agent — passes the same bar: formal requirements traced to code, annotations validated, coverage measured where it matters, hazards analyzed on the paths that hurt.

NOTE 2 — The gate does not negotiate and does not tire. Green means the promises hold. Anything else loops back as a finding — visible, reproducible, assigned.

52CHECKS
1BAR FOR ALL CODE
≠0EXIT UNTIL GREEN
0
REQUIREMENTS APPROVED — AND COUNTING · JSONPARSER, FIRST PUBLIC COMPONENT

NOTE 3 — Requirements written in FRETish — the structured requirements language from NASA's FRET program. Checked with the Kind2 model checker and the Z3 solver. MC/DC coverage across 11 languages. Hazard analysis where failure costs the most.

NOTE 4 — Defect classes close everywhere at once: one panic class traced to 8 sites, swept the same day. Closed classes stay closed — the corpus pins them; the gate re-proves them on every run.

Findings ship ready to fix.

NOTE 5 — Every finding carries a reproducer and an agent-ready fix prompt. Hand it to your engineers, paste it to your agents, or let our fix sprints take it — the same gate grades all three.

NOTE 6 — The loop closes when the gate says so, not when someone says done.

FINDING · CLASS: PANIC ON MALFORMED INPUT
SITES: 8 · REPRODUCER: ATTACHED · FIX PROMPT: ATTACHED
STATUS: CLASS CLOSED — SWEPT SAME DAY

This drawing includes our errors.

NOTE 7 — During the jsonparser audit, a defect in Set() escaped with 100% MC/DC on the changed code — and was caught downstream. We published the postmortem, pinned the class, and tightened the gate. An assurance system you can trust is one that shows you where it failed.

FIELD CONDITIONS

46% / 33% DEVELOPERS WHO DISTRUST AI OUTPUT ACCURACY VS. TRUST IT — STACK OVERFLOW SURVEY 2025
90% / 30% TEAMS USING AI TO WRITE CODE VS. TRUSTING IT — DORA

NOTE 8 — That gap closes with evidence, not vibes. Proof is the evidence.

One component. Four weeks. Then continuous.

FIXED FEEONE COMPONENT≈4 WEEKSTHEN CONTINUOUS

NOTE 9 — We scope one component you care about, stand up the gate and the corpus, and hand you a living assurance system your agents and humans share. Then it runs — and remembers — continuously.

FORM PRF-15/A · SCOPING REQUEST
RECEIVED · FORM PRF-15/A LOGGED
A named human — not an autoresponder — replies within two business days.