Your cursor is the audit lens. Move it over any claimTap any claim to audit it
✦ Introducing SynergyOS 2.0
The all-in-one platform your team will love. Vague Love fails no test suite. Which promise does this sentence actually make? Name one promise. Then let a machine check it.
Trusted by teams at
One platform, infinite possibilities.
Your data, at the speed of thought.
Uncheckable No number. No percentile. No witness. “p99 query ≤ 240 ms on the reference dataset” is a claim. This is a mood.Sleep easy. We’ve got you covered.
Not a standard “Grade” is an adjective, not a control. There is no ISO certificate for vibes. Name the control. Show the last audit date. Publish the pen-test summary.Let the machine find what matters.
Undefined Which decision does it change, for whom, and who answers when it is wrong? The working rule: an agent may draft. A person approves.Backed by our SLA and a public status page.
Checkable · pass A number, a consequence, a public record. Anyone can test it, any day. This is what a claim looks like. The other eight on this page are decoration.The verdict · this page, audited
The one that passed named a number and a consequence. Your codebase is held together by sentences like the other eight: in tickets, in comments, in READMEs nobody re-reads. Proof writes the promises down where a machine can check them, and re-checks them on every commit.
Receipts · one public audit, buger/jsonparser
signed requirements, approved by the engineers who own the code.
findings fixed upstream, in public pull requests.
functions traced into the graph, bound to the promises they serve.
published miss, with a blameless, signed postmortem.
What a finding looks like
affected 130: 31 requirements · 10 implementation files
33 test files · 56 documentation files · cycles: none
Every finding is a test your engineers can run on their own hardware. The gate re-runs the whole family on every release after, so the bug you paid to fix stays fixed.
The one that got away
Set() could drop sibling values without reporting an error. It escaped one of our audits of that code. A downstream user found it, and told us.
We published a blameless postmortem, signed by Leonid Bugaev, and pinned the whole defect class so the same shape of bug turns the gate red on the day it returns.
The affected code carried 100% MC/DC coverage at the time of the miss. Coverage of the code was full, and the promise still broke. That is why coverage is counted against intent as well as against code.
Your turn
One component, chosen with you. Four weeks with your engineers. Then the gate runs without us, and every promise your software makes is checked on every commit.
Fixed fee, agreed before work starts · not self-serve, on purpose