Check reference
Review trace links after either side changes
A trace link was reviewed for particular requirement and artifact content. suspect_clean reopens the relationship when either side changes or a reviewed target fingerprint is missing.
What the check observes
Review state records the requirement fingerprint and a fingerprint for each linked target. The check compares both with current content. Target scope follows the link: a Go symbol can be fingerprinted at declaration scope, a Markdown target at the relevant requirement sections, and a satisfies target by its meaning. Commit timestamps and file modification times do not decide whether a link remains current.
Example: a test link was added after review
Illustrative case. The requirement's existing implementation and test targets still match their reviewed fingerprints. A new test link is added. Only the new relationship lacks a reviewed target fingerprint; adding it does not make every unchanged sibling relationship suspect.
proof trace suspect
# After reviewing this requirement-to-target relationship
proof trace review SYS-REQ-042 --citation pkg/retry/retry_test.goResolve the finding
- Inspect why the link is suspect: changed requirement, changed target, or missing target review.
- Reassess whether the artifact still implements, verifies, documents, or satisfies the requirement. Correct the implementation or relationship if it no longer does.
- Record a trace review with relevant citations only after that assessment. Preserve any failing evidence or unresolved impact instead of refreshing fingerprints mechanically.
Run and interpret
proof audit --check suspect_clean --verboseThis verify-stage check reports suspect relationships for review and is registered at error severity. Do not assume a suspect finding is non-blocking. Legacy reviews without target fingerprints need an actual re-review or a supported migration from review-time provenance. A current timestamp alone is insufficient.
Matching fingerprints mean that the recorded relationship is current for those inputs. They do not prove the original judgment was correct or that a linked test ran successfully. Trace freshness complements requirement review, typed evidence, and execution checks; it cannot replace them.
Continue from here
Review code deltas against intent. Review interface implementation drift.
Bring a changed requirement and the code or test link whose validity is now uncertain. Bring a change to Proof.